Sungrow SBR160 HV vs FoxESS CQ6 12kWh
Side-by-side comparison of the Sungrow SBR160 HV and FoxESS CQ6 12kWh home battery systems for Australian homes.
Quick verdict
The FoxESS CQ6 12kWh is $3,500 cheaper at $7,000 vs $10,500. The Sungrow SBR160 HV has more storage (16 kWh vs 11.98 kWh). The Sungrow SBR160 HV delivers more continuous power (9.6 kW vs 5 kW). The Sungrow SBR160 HV is more efficient (97% vs 95% round-trip).
| Spec | Sungrow SBR160 HV | FoxESS CQ6 12kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price (supply) | $10,500 | $7,000 |
| Capacity | 16 kWh | 11.98 kWh |
| Continuous power | 9.6 kW | 5 kW |
| Peak power | 15 kW | 10 kW |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Round-trip efficiency | 97% | 95% |
| Warranty | 10 years | 12 years |
| IP rating | IP55 | IP65 |
| Scalable | Yes | Yes |
| AC coupled | No | No |
| DC coupled | Yes | Yes |
| Grid forming | Yes | Yes |
Which should you choose?
Cost per kWh
The Sungrow SBR160 HV costs $656/kWh of storage and the FoxESS CQ6 12kWh costs $584/kWh. The FoxESS CQ6 12kWh delivers more storage per dollar.
Storage capacity
The Sungrow SBR160 HV stores 16 kWh compared to 11.98 kWh for the FoxESS CQ6 12kWh. That's a significant difference â the Sungrow SBR160 HV can cover more of your evening consumption without needing grid top-up.
Output power
The Sungrow SBR160 HV delivers 9.6 kW continuous vs 5 kW for the FoxESS CQ6 12kWh. Higher continuous power means the battery can run more appliances simultaneously during an outage or when discharging for self-consumption.
On price
The FoxESS CQ6 12kWh is $3,500 less than the Sungrow SBR160 HV. That is a substantial price difference. Consider whether the extra capacity or features of the Sungrow SBR160 HV justify the premium.
Related guides
- Compare all home batteries â full product grid with filters
- Best home batteries in Australia 2026 â our ranked recommendations
- Battery sizing calculator â find the right capacity for your household
- Solar battery ROI calculator â estimate your payback period